Wendy Davis: Surgically Constructed “Human Barbie Doll”?

[Update:  Welcome Althouse readers.  And Instapundit readers. And Wonkette readers. And Mediaite readers. And Amanda Marcotte (Slate) readers. And Esquire readers. And Salon readers. And Weasel Zippers readers. And TFN Insider readers. And Austin Chronicle readers.  And Houston Chronicle readers.  And Dallas Observer readers. And Reddit readers. And Times Union readers.  And Liberally Lean readers. And Foolocracy readers. And Immoral Minority readers.  And Daily  Dot readers. And CultureMap Houston readers. And Daily Kos readers. And Gloss readers. And Legal Insurrection readers. And Juanita Jean readers.]

Most people — at least those without a plastic surgeon on retainer — do not become more good looking as they age from their late 20s to their early 50s.  Without extreme artificial intervention, even the luckiest among us — those blessed with good genes who exercise prudence toward their physical safety and health (for example, by avoiding guns and alcohol) — can at most aim to delay life’s inevitable physical decline, and come close to maintaining their good looks.  Compare, for example, these “before” and “after” photos of law professor Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit), currently age 52.






Or consider these “before” and “after” photos of President Barack Obama, currently age 51:








Both men were good looking in their late 20s, and both remain good looking in their early 50s (despite all the guns and alcohol), but no one would suggest they are better looking than when they were younger.

Now consider Texas state Senator Wendy R. Davis, who has recently been in the news being touted (however dubiously) as the Left’s technologically enhancedfeminist superhero.”  She is 50 years old.  Yet, unlike Reynolds and Obama, but like Mac Davis, it appears she gets better looking each day.  If she has not found the Fountain of Youth, at minimum she has found very talented plastic surgeons and image consultants who have readied her for her closeup.

Somehow, during the past two decades she has been transformed from a frumpy, pleasant looking but plain-faced, flat-chested brunette with thick, messy hair, into a buxom blonde with excellent facial features and sleek, long, perfectly coiffed hair, like she stepped straight out of Vogue.

For someone who in the early 1990s was a feminist activist in law school, and who is currently posing as a champion of women’s rights, standing up to men who seek to dictate the way women should live, she seems to have devoted an unusual amount of attention to her physical appearance.

Don’t believe me — believe the photographic evidence.  Senator Davis entered Harvard Law School in 1990 at age 27, the same age President Obama was when he entered (two years earlier).  Here is her photo from the Spring, 1991 yearbook (the same volume in which President Obama’s “before” photos appeared):


(Her bio lists her as active in two leading feminist organizations:  the Battered Women’s Advocacy Project and the Women’s Law Association).

Current photos of Senator Davis depict someone who is not just more physically attractive, but who arguably seems younger  than the woman in her yearbook photo, even though that photo was taken 22 years ago. Her transformation is arguably more startling than that of women who have used plastic surgery in an effort to become “Human Barbie Dolls” (see, for example, “before” and “after” photos here). You be the judge:  Wendy Davis, superhero, or superfake “Human Barbie Doll”?





Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • realistic sex dolls  On May 11, 2017 at 5:50 am

    Thanks! It is an wonderful internet site!

  • te  On August 28, 2015 at 7:11 am

    Its not my first time to visit this site, i am browsing this site dailly and
    take pleasant facts from here every day.

  • Tresa  On January 1, 2015 at 8:36 pm

    You post interesting content here. Your blog deserves much bigger audience.
    It can go viral if you give it initial boost, i know useful
    service that can help you, just type in google: svetsern traffic tips

  • Sod Buster  On October 13, 2014 at 3:29 pm

    Thru all her augmentations and enhancements missy windy chose to keep her wart.
    But she discarded two of her pre-natal children and abandoned another daughter in the pursuit of her career.
    We are told, retroactively, that windy even named one of her daughters Tate Eloise before she hired a paid a hired assassin to ‘quiet’ little Tate’s beating heart by injecting it with the same kind of drug that Oklahoma executioners used to kill convicted rapist, torturer and murderer Clayton Lockett.
    Perhaps windy keeps her wart as a memento to remind her of the price her babies paid to preserve her political ambitions.
    To paraphrase a line from the animated movie ‘Shrek’:
    “I know some of YOU may die in MY quest, but that is a sacrifice I am willing to make.”
    Feministas claim that a human embryo/fetus is just a blob of parasitic tissue comparable to a wart and having it surgically removed is no different than excising a genital wart.
    windy preserved her wart and discarded her child. The least she could do is give her wart a name.

    • 3fingerpete  On October 16, 2014 at 9:13 pm

      She abandoned her daughter, who at the time was 20 years old and attending college? The same daughter who currently works for the Wendy Davis gubernatorial campaign? The shameless huzzy! Have the church elders been informed?

  • motiurnuggeta  On August 12, 2014 at 7:11 am

    So nice surgery job,,,
    cosmetic surgery

  • accurate thermometer for babies  On May 20, 2014 at 11:39 am

    Perfect Blog thanks for the informative post

  • Ruhi khanruhi  On March 28, 2014 at 9:12 am

    Nice post
    If you know about How to Enlarge Breast Size.

  • kona coffee  On March 27, 2014 at 1:51 am

    Hi! Quick question that’s totally off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly?
    My web site looks weird when viewing from my iphone. I’m trying to find a theme
    or plugin that might be able to fix this issue.
    If you have any suggestions, please share. Cheers!

  • league of legends free riot points  On March 12, 2014 at 4:30 pm

    Heya outstanding blog! Does running a blog such as this
    take a large amount of work? I’ve absolutely no knowledge of coding but I had been hoping to start
    my own blog in the near future. Anyhow, should you have any recommendations or tips for new
    blog owners please share. I understand this is off subject however I just wanted to ask.
    Thank you!

  • mature live cams  On March 9, 2014 at 6:22 am

    Every weekend i used to mature pay a visit this web page,
    as i want enjoyment, for the reason that this this web page
    conations genuinely nice funny information too.

  • RJaol  On February 10, 2014 at 7:42 pm

    The only thing I see when I look at a picture or video of Wendy Davis is that huge f’ing mole. On the bright side, at least it doesn’t have a bunch of hairs growing out of it.

  • Jackson  On February 6, 2014 at 9:39 am

    It is great to see your helpful detail about the subject, here also I was visit a cosmetic and plastic suregry website http://www.plasticsurgerythai.com.

  • Jeffrey Giraffe  On January 27, 2014 at 4:27 pm

    It tickles me that the Conservatives are so frightened of Senator Davis that they have already started this kind of crap. At the end of the day, please learn that people are sick of your hate based politics…..

  • Robert W  On January 26, 2014 at 12:39 am

    Psst…. some say Wendy Davis shaves – now get this – the hair off of her legs!!?? Ewww!!! Can you believe it?!! She’s so fake!!

  • texmex  On January 25, 2014 at 8:34 pm

    I couldn’t read all of the comments. I saw that she was born in Rhode Island…how long has she actually lived in Texas?

    • 3fingerpete  On October 16, 2014 at 9:10 pm

      Neither Presidents Bush was born in Texas, either, yet we are stuck with two Bush libraries here.

  • timus dillinger  On January 24, 2014 at 2:48 pm

    not that different, a little makeup and straightened / dyed hair. she should have done this when she was younger.
    why not attack her positions on issues instead of going for ad hominem farce?
    this is the same line of attack that is leveled at Boehner, who cries when he gets emotional, so can’t be a real man, or at Edwards/Trump, who are both far too concerned with their hair, so can’t be real men. etc. etc.
    I know little about Davis, other than that she stood up for abortion in a conservative state. I am not a big fan of abortion (seems very irresponsible of both the father and mother of the fetus). but all I see is that she is spending a little more effort to look good. something most women of a certain age do, she’s not overdoing it at all.
    Stick to the issues, if she was dramatically altered you might make the case that it shows a mindset you need to guard against in elected officials; to my mind this doesn’t rise to that level, so YOU just end up looking bad for attacking a person based on physical attributes.

  • Freddie G.  On January 22, 2014 at 12:12 am

    I am 53 but I am on my tenth year active duty from my second mobilization. Between very little gray in my hair, Army workouts daily and eating fairly well, I look like I am in my early forties. Me and Wendy still got it. Suck a pickle conservatives.

    • retcaptain  On January 23, 2014 at 2:00 pm

      Apparently WINDY sucked one, until graduation day!

  • Freddie G.  On January 22, 2014 at 12:06 am

    Wendy runs everyday and works out. My wife had big hair and changed her makeup so she actually looks better in some ways and she is fifty. Maybe Wendy had breast augmentation, so what. She did take the time to send me a very thoughtful handwritten note when I was deployed to Afghanistan. She also fought the ignorant morons who cut the Texas education budget $5 billion. She has more character, sincerity and intelligence in her little pinky than any Republican in TX.

    • retcaptain  On January 23, 2014 at 2:01 pm

      It’s for the children!

  • https://myspace.com/  On January 5, 2014 at 6:28 am

    This is very interesting, You are a very skilled blogger.
    I have joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your magnificent post.
    Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks!

  • Timothy Horrigan  On November 3, 2013 at 6:03 pm

    All you have proved is that she dyes her hair and uses makeup.

    • Timothy Horrigan  On November 3, 2013 at 6:13 pm

      The yearbook picture was taken when she was a married 28 year old housewife who was raising a child while holding down multiple jobs and attending an academically rigorous but culturally conservative college. She also wasn’t a celebrity yet. She probably wouldn’t have much time or energy left over to doll herself up even if she was expected to. And she looks pretty good in her old pictures anyway.

      • Sod Buster  On October 13, 2014 at 3:59 pm

        While it may be technically correct that windy was married, it would be hard to argue that she was a wife or mother or housewife when her husband, her daughter and her house were more than a thousand miles away in Texas for the two years it took her to complete law school in Massachusetts.
        [windy would probably ‘bitch slap’ you if she knew you demeaned her by calling her a ‘housewife’.]
        windy was not drafted and deployed in military service. She CHOSE to leave her husband and child behind and as soon as she had graduated and her sugar-daddy had paid off her college loans she divorced him.
        To his credit, her estranged sugar-daddy sued for and was granted custody of their daughter. That judicial ruling should give the even a novice some indication of missy windy’s fitness as a ‘ mother’.
        I wonder if the presiding judge was a wife, mother and domestic administrator.

  • flat screen tv  On October 18, 2013 at 12:27 am

    Useful info. Fortunate me I discoverred your website unintentionally,
    and I am tunned why this accident didn’t came about
    in advance! I bookmarked it.

    • James Hoyt  On October 18, 2013 at 12:36 am

      Yes because being upset a woman is both powerful and attractive is a terrible thing and they must be attacked for it.

      I hope she’s the next governor of my sate. Would be nice to have some real leadership for a change.

      • Jukin  On January 22, 2014 at 11:31 am

        Ask that about Sarah Palin. Not very self aware are you?

  • Amanda  On October 3, 2013 at 1:24 pm

    wow they did a really big changes

  • Carole  On September 25, 2013 at 6:50 pm

    Seriously, I am so glad that this isn’t representative of most Americans. Us out in the rest of the world, just read crap like this and laugh. Has this blog writer nothing better to do with their time?

    • Rich  On October 1, 2013 at 5:54 pm

      It really is hilarious, she got prettier! Pile on the hate just because! At least the “author” has made his juvenile thoughts available for all to see lol

  • Karol  On September 21, 2013 at 3:11 am

    Hi, after reading this amazing post i am also cheerful to share my knowledge here with mates.

  • eve  On August 12, 2013 at 8:33 pm

    Ignore the haters, realwendydavis. That’s all they have. Notice they are all Democrats *suspicious*.

    I’m female and have not had to resort to plastic surgery to succeed in my career. Yes, looks do matter…..and when one has to resort to changing one’s looks to get a leg up, one wonders what did they think was wrong with themselves in the first place. Certainly, this woman had the coin to take advantage of plastic surgery as she saw something wrong with the way she looked, something her rivals may not have had. In the current occupants in the WH says, “phoney”.

  • jual jaket  On August 8, 2013 at 6:54 am

    I think this is among the most significant info for me.
    And i am glad reading your article. But want to remark on few general
    things, The website style is ideal, the articles is really nice :
    D. Good job, cheers

  • ブルガリ 財布  On August 1, 2013 at 4:52 pm

    Just what exactly having internet sites give the web page to help with making funds out of really adds currently being added the web page?

  • Ihatethisplanet  On July 13, 2013 at 10:52 pm

    To whoever wrote this, I have no other words in my vocabulary to express the fact that you are a vile sack of shit.

    • wendy is a fake  On July 20, 2013 at 11:36 am

      The truth hurts doesn’t it. I’m sure Wendy will offer you one of her sacks of silicone to cry on.:) I’m generally liberal but even I’m not snowed by this woman’s bullshit. Sometimes women’s rights means the right to call out other women out on their staged political scams.

  • sokdu  On July 11, 2013 at 7:07 pm

    you seriously need to grab yourself a life.

  • Box24 Casino  On July 10, 2013 at 6:39 pm

    He had great plans on building a film, writing new books, arranging an additional trial, and absolutely new projects on blackjack.
    My suggestion can be that will in no way opt for a Box24 Casino on how nice advantage they provide, because from the really conclusion you may usually eliminate
    a bit.

    • plin  On July 11, 2013 at 3:34 pm

      she has awesome boobs. i want to impregnate her and she is welcome to abort the parasite.

  • Dick d ellen santurum  On July 8, 2013 at 12:11 am

    This is a riot…Holy crap is this all the right wing could come up with? God they are such f*tards. I love listening or seeing their side. So hypocritical, and yet so so so funny.

  • Pat Brennan  On July 6, 2013 at 6:23 pm

    Hard to believe how stupid the right wing is.

    • retcaptain  On January 23, 2014 at 2:04 pm

      biden much?

  • Instapundit Fan  On July 6, 2013 at 3:34 pm

    A recent Instapundit post may hold the answer to why Davis looks younger than she did 22 years ago: maybe she’s a SEX MANIAC! Instapundit links to a recent study that having regular sex can make people look 5 to 7 years younger:

    Instapundit doesn’t apply this to Davis specifically, but in another post about a woman who’s 43 and complains about how old she looks, he advises her that with regular sex she can look 36:

    So maybe Davis ended up looking so young by having WAY more sex than everyone else? Maybe having sex several times a day would be enough to shave 25 years off her appearance, and end up looking younger than she looked as a student. Glad Instapundit’s on top of all this cutting-edge research.

  • rilriia  On July 6, 2013 at 11:07 am

    Absolutely read it! C’mon, you know you laughed when you saw it and part of you went “no… no… they didn’t… they couldn’t…. it has no bearing on….” and the rest of you laughed because it was funny. So the politically and socially aware part that tried to deny that the author is using this as a political debate platform joined in the laughter because it realized two words–the only two words to describe this and the platform and position (not to mention how it demeans Republicans, the GOP, and the Tea Party):

    “epic fail”.

  • Dnice  On July 5, 2013 at 5:24 pm

    hating like a 12 year old who doesn’t understand the world and will never because he gets his info from a book full of fantasy.

  • Deb M  On July 5, 2013 at 2:58 pm

    I, personally, think it’s fine and great that WD is keeping up with the fashion trends. Straight hair is in, and there’s nothing wrong with going blond as you get older, it doesn’t cast shadows on your face that highlight facial lines, or have as big of a contrast as brown does when your roots are growing out. Trust me on this, although I’m currently dark brown myself. It also looks to me like she keeps physically active vs full body lipo.

    Also, as for feminism and not coloring hair, no boob jobs, or any other enhancements – I don’t buy it. If you like it, the way it makes you look, then do it. Just like hair and clothing styles. Feminism isn’t about being ‘all natural’, it’s about being able to be fully who you are, and if that means a boob job makes your feel better, so be it.

  • rilriia  On July 5, 2013 at 2:29 pm

    loling so hard, I nearly lmao!

    Do yourself a favor, go out, educate yourself. Read a book…. Then get a platform. You do nothing but make us laugh–and this was shard all over FB so my friends who #standwithwendy can see it and laugh with me.

    Because laughter, as we all know, is much sweeter when shared with friends.

    • realwendydavis  On July 5, 2013 at 4:37 pm

      Glad you enjoyed it.

      • rilriia  On July 6, 2013 at 11:03 am

        First, a spelling error corrected since I am a moderator of a pro-women’s group, I often have multiple tabs open and am engaged in multiple tasks. A keyboard that desperately needs replaced doesn’t help. So *shared all over FB.

        Secondly, you have chutzpah to reply, I’ll give you that. (No, I’m not Jewish.) What I want to know is where you get off doing this… You support the anti-Davis folks, which means you also support their Christian-only ideology. (Sorry, but you took that on when you signed up.)

        So where do you get the right to judge people? It’s against the Christian religion. I can cite a number of quotes on ‘judge not’ and hypocrisy. In fact, to rebut Christian adages (usually taken out of context), I have offered a reply of scriptures to my group. While I’m not Christian, I have read the Bible…

        I would have respected you a lot more if you had a point to make–even one I disagreed with. But this … this is garbage. How dare you classify anyone–any woman–as being less than because she is attractive and socially/politically active?

        You just gave a nod to putting women back into the kitchen with rollers in their hair and acting as brood mares. I would like to know, Sir (most likely) or Ma’am (which would be tragic to say the least), how you can possibly justify yourself or your actions….

        Oh and while I’m dying my hair purple, my FB is listed as a permalink…. Feel free to bash me while you’re at it. I’m beautiful, I’m 35 and still get carded, I’m too poor to afford plastic surgery (and wouldn’t do it anyway because it’s against my belief system), and I’m politically active. Oh, and just in case you want to, let me inform you now (so you don’t look quite so stupid) that the lighting in my room is terrible (see ‘part of the 99%’ comment) and my hair is red–for the moment.

  • outoftowner  On July 5, 2013 at 12:58 pm

    You Go, Girl.

    • rilriia  On July 5, 2013 at 2:31 pm

      The 90s called, they want their stupid, grammatically incorrect, poorly worded catch phrase back.

      Please, think of the English speaking people…

  • D. Carpenter  On July 5, 2013 at 7:34 am

    You website is just as pathetic as the Republican Party. Now that they can’t keep Gays from getting married, they are harassing women again.

  • Roor Peept  On July 4, 2013 at 11:12 pm

    Congratulations on the most pig-ignorant thing I have read on the internet for weeks. No, really, your total ignorance of women’s beauty secrets is like a BENGHAZI!I!I! of idiocy.

  • Sarah  On July 4, 2013 at 9:40 pm

    Okay… she’s obviously had some surgical magic and whoever did the work is very talented. Glad to see she grew out of the frumpy feminazi look. Too bad she didn’t outgrow her immature, ideological “give me” politics.

  • andrew  On July 4, 2013 at 9:30 pm

    A face made for anonymous, puerile, petty, reactionary, misogynistic blogging have you?

  • JBeez  On July 4, 2013 at 5:08 pm

    Obviously, you’ve never seen what top supermodels REALLY look like, without all the makeup, hairspray, and PhotoShop. Or, you’ve never seen the show about the ugly women who had all kinds of help done to bring out their true beauty.

    If you did/had, you’d know that Ms. Davis has good bone structure and nice skin (as evidenced in her yearbook photo), which is all easily and aesthetically enhanceable, with the right application of makeup, frizz-taming hair products, a straightening iron, a good colorist, and a better wardrobe.

    She also had good teeth to begin with, but being in the public eye, she probably had veneers applied as do multitudes of celebrities and public figures. I see no “witchcraft” here, just a highlighting of her good points, which ANY smart woman does. You must be male, to be so easily fooled by makeup and hair color. (Hee hee. Our evil plan is working, Queen Maybelline.)

  • prosey  On July 4, 2013 at 10:45 am

    Smells like desperation to me. *gasp* Wendy Davis knows how to use hair coloring and a straightening iron! *scandalous!!*

    Begone, before someone drops a house on you, too…

  • Carl Russo  On July 4, 2013 at 1:57 am

    In the absence of an argument, attack her looks. Dumb shit.

  • shoclergirl90  On July 3, 2013 at 11:10 pm

    So she is smart and pretty? The horror!

  • TexasIdentityCrisis  On July 3, 2013 at 9:08 pm

    I mean double lol on the theater, I believe Ms. Davis has been chosen… http://votesmart.org/bill/16587/43814/108093/establishes-certain-tax-exemptions-for-firearms-manufacturers#.UdIYGzs4smQ

  • TexasIdentityCrisis  On July 3, 2013 at 9:06 pm

    Hey, I don’t like either party. But, I bet Democrats don’t know this. hehehe http://votesmart.org/bill/16768/44383/108093/authorizes-firearms-in-vehicles-on-college-campuses#.UdIGkjs4smQ

  • Michael  On July 3, 2013 at 8:17 pm

    You are an IDIOT. And if there is any justice in the world no woman (or man for that matter) will ever touch you again.

  • Daniel  On July 3, 2013 at 3:42 pm

    Riveting. This is quality journalism in action. I hear she sounds cute when she sneezes – STOP THE PRESSES!

  • Doug Crews  On July 3, 2013 at 3:31 pm

    Wow, is this what you’re reduced to? “Pathetic” doesn’t even begin to describe this.

  • Kate Karwowska (@KateKarwowska)  On July 3, 2013 at 3:01 pm

    I thought Repubs love MILFS?!?

  • Kate Karwowska (@KateKarwowska)  On July 3, 2013 at 2:59 pm

    Really? That’s all you’ve got? Thanks for playing and here’s a lovely parting gift of Rice-A-Roni.

  • Ann Tucker-Gwinn  On July 3, 2013 at 2:29 pm

    She looks exactly the same, except her hair is not styled in an out of date fashion (in other words, she uses a hair straightener like 90% of the female world in 2013), and she went blond. As a feminist myself, I guess I better throw out the lipstick and my hair product…wouldn’t want to lose my cred to some idiot anon blogger.

  • Matt Lamb  On July 3, 2013 at 2:29 pm

    Wow…that’s all you’ve got?! This just goes to show how low you will go to try to rally resistance against someone who doesn’t share your political views. It is one if the most pathetic things I think I’ve ever seen. Reagan dyed his hair–where’s the slam on him?

    Point is: who really gives a sh*t about this?

  • Susan Ray  On July 3, 2013 at 2:27 pm

    And your point is….? Oh, yeah. To show just how DESPERATE the Texas GOP is to discredit someone who can challenge their boy Perry. Keep it up, Texas GOP. You’re going down faster than the Titanic.

    • wendy is a fake  On July 20, 2013 at 1:04 pm

      Eh.It’s a lot of hot air from TX demo-feminists.I grew up in TX and there is NOT a large feminist presence there,nor do most WOMEN in TX identify with those sorts of labels. Wendy Davis is trying to play NY/LA/SF feminist politics in TX and it is obviously a rigged game. Most of the women championing Wendy Davis are feminists or dems who have never been to TX but believe all the media stereotypes about the state.The “mob” was gathered on CL and social media then bussed in – if you ask even blue leaning women in TX they will tell you that they are smart enough to know b.s. when they see it.

      • James Hoyt  On August 7, 2013 at 2:29 pm

        I live in Austin and yes there is a strong civil rights presence. (civil rights include women rights aka feminists).

        You all are just scared with the rising Hispanic population in Texas that might switch the state from red to blue.. which would mean that a Republican leader would never ever be elected in the US.. which would be great.

        Now if democrats could only learn how to be progressive and not corporate shills like republicans, then we will actually get somewhere.

  • karen503  On July 3, 2013 at 2:21 pm

    If you’re going to make a big deal over dark curly hair on the head of a 20 year old vs. smoothed tinted-blonde hair 30 years later, let’s take a look at what right wing icon Sarah Palin has looked like over the past 30 years:

    Sarah Heath 1982: http://tinyurl.com/of62gwh
    Sarah Heath Palin 1989: http://tinyurl.com/kojfptc
    Sarah Palin 2013 (2 weeks ago): http://tinyurl.com/lavha6h

  • john  On July 3, 2013 at 12:56 pm

    Texas is turning blue, probably in 2024, but every year less red

    • wendy is a fake  On July 20, 2013 at 1:07 pm

      wishful thinking…

    • James Hoyt  On August 7, 2013 at 2:30 pm

      2024? Try 2016. All the old bigots will eventual die out and with the rising Hispanic population, I see it happening a lot sooner.

  • Dixiecup  On July 3, 2013 at 11:59 am

    So she colored her hair, wears makeup, and got a flat iron? Who cares? She’s fighting for the rights of women to make their own choices about their bodies. To me, that says what she does to her body is nobody else’s business. It certainly hasn’t hindered her mind, so who cares.

  • RenegadeFL  On July 3, 2013 at 11:44 am

    I want to see more websites like this. They show Republican’s true colors. Yellow to the core.

  • Teri  On July 3, 2013 at 11:38 am

    Lol, is that all you’ve got? So she’s beautiful and has a brain–not mutually exclusive, you know. You need to listen to what she stands for and not get distracted by her looks. And for the record, not that it matters, a lot of people get better looking with age…

  • Dick Gozinya  On July 3, 2013 at 10:33 am

    Oh, look Laura Bush with a different hair color and what appears to be a real face lift: http://www.ienhance.com/cms_files/original/laura_bush_before_after.jpg

  • Dick Gozinya  On July 3, 2013 at 10:30 am

    Lulz. When (2) an entire blog devoted to discrediting you has (2) a SINGLE post on it commenting about your current hairstyle — you’re doin’ it right, Wendy Davis.

  • Granny C  On July 3, 2013 at 10:21 am

    It’s hard to believe that in this day and age, that you would try to discredit a woman because of her looks. Maybe we haven’t come such a long way, baby.

    Sen. David has changed her hair color and doesn’t appear to have aged to your satisfaction, so you try to negate her stand concerning a woman’s right to make her own decisions regarding her reproductive health.

    How 18th century of you. Go crawl back under your rock.

  • shiv  On July 3, 2013 at 9:06 am

    That is some butthurt conservative response to the courage of a lady who clearly has the bigger balls! A real deep and analytic butthurt.

  • Gary  On July 3, 2013 at 8:41 am

    If Ronald Reagan could dye his hair . . . well, just sayin’. Three guesses on who is the ghost writer behind this juvenile crush on Wendy Davis: 1. Sarah Palin, nah, the writing contains full sentences; 2. Rick Perry, I suppose is possible, and 3. oh, can’t remember.

  • Klem Johansen (@klemjohansen)  On July 3, 2013 at 8:13 am

    Whoever (or whatever) put this together ought to feel some sense of shame, deep down in what they used to refer to as their “soul.”

  • Bob in Texas  On July 3, 2013 at 8:12 am

    So, a woman who was busy being a single mom and HLS student looked “rough”…. and now that her kids are out of the house and she has more disposable income, she can actually go to the hair salon and go jogging?

    Man, that’s news!

  • davrdrum  On July 3, 2013 at 7:40 am

    So you have someone not only way better looking than Sarah the stoopid… But SMART to boot! Good luck with this blog haters!

    Btw…time to get divorced and get remarried to your same sex friend. That way y’all will never have to worry about abortion again!

    See? Gay marriage fixed that for ya!

  • roowaz  On July 3, 2013 at 6:12 am

    But the whole point of feminism isn’t to not be beautiful.
    If Sen. Davis wants to wear makeup and straighten her hair, she has every right to. The only problem with adhering to the beauty standards is expecting EVERY woman to do it. A woman shouldn’t be expected to shave or straighten her hair or wear makeup just because she’s a woman– but if she wants to, it is HER choice and she should never be shamed for it.
    Resorting to name-calling and to degrading one of the most brilliant minds of the decade by commenting on her looks rather than her political prowess is about as childish as it gets.
    In short, Wendy Davis has every right to be as beautiful and feminine as she wants. This does not detract from her feminism or being a superhero. The two are very unrelated. Feminism isn’t about looking like a lumberjack in order to dismantle the patriarchy. It’s about being allowed to choose how one looks (or, at least, a VERY tiny part of feminism is) and that is exactly what Sen. Davis has done.
    Shaming her for it will change nothing, because her looks do not have anything to do with who she is and what she stands for.

  • Helen Balcony (@CastIronBalcony)  On July 3, 2013 at 4:51 am

    OH. MY. GOD.
    Wendy davis used to have a DIFFERENT HAIR COLOUR!!!!
    And has changed her APPEARANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    In other news, the Instapundit has a really, really silly hairstyle which could have been chosen by his mum at 4 years.
    THIS PROVES………………..SOMETHING!!!1111!!!!111!!!
    You people are adorable.

  • Andrew  On July 3, 2013 at 12:17 am

    The fact she still has the mole on her face is probably proof she’s never been under the knife. She probably just has good genes and more importantly she undoubtedly takes good care of herself. I know she runs regularly and she probably eats a healthy diet. I think she is stunning. I’m totally infatuated. The mole adds to her overwhelming charm.

  • James Deen  On July 2, 2013 at 11:14 pm

    Let me speculate that the author of this blog is some fat ugly single impotent 50 something failure of a male that could only dream of being with a woman like Wendy Davis. Come on, coward, lets see what you look like.

    Girls like her rejected you back in high school and you never got over it.

  • anonymous  On July 2, 2013 at 11:05 pm

    Your just a damn idiot if you believe any of the crap the OP is posting

  • notadumbass  On July 2, 2013 at 10:39 pm

    OH MY GOD! She did something different with her hair when she got older! That must mean she is a total fraud!

    Is that all you got?

  • Gob Bluth  On July 2, 2013 at 10:34 pm

    I can hear your sobbing from here.

  • jane  On July 2, 2013 at 10:05 pm

    Absolutely ridiculous. A shame you have so much free time on your hands that you needed to “research” this. I look much better in MY fifties than I did in my thirties…and yes…I believe in women’s reproductive choice (as in—stay out of my ovaries unless you are my OBGYN)…and I DO go to a beauty parlor to have my lovely locks tended to.


    Is *this* what being a republican is all about these days? How about getting to work on some real issues and stop being such a thug?


  • MJ  On July 2, 2013 at 10:01 pm

    Apparently her words got to you otherwise you would not be attacking her appearance. Way to go Wendy! Coloring one’s hair and being a feminist are not mutually exclusive.

  • Christian Rewoldt (@crewoldt)  On July 2, 2013 at 9:59 pm

    These right wing extremists are despicable and quickly moving from just plain despised to hated. Keep it up please, 2014 is soon approaching as is the slow, painful death of this conservative “movement,” so aptly named.

  • Jesus  On July 2, 2013 at 9:07 pm

    I spy someone who seriously needs to get a life… (Psst! It’s you!)

  • Larb  On July 2, 2013 at 7:51 pm

    Quite possibly the dumbest blogsite on the internet.

  • Lori Scarmardo  On July 2, 2013 at 7:49 pm

    So she lightened her hair & bought a flat iron? And your point is??? She still looks like the same person to me. And it takes a real jackass to say she’s more attractive now than she was then. The woman in the old photos is an attractive woman, as is the woman in the current photos. Just different hair. As a licensed cosmetologist, I can appreciate that. Most women update their look over the years. We tend to get bored after a few decades.

    But the real question is…. just what the hell does any of this have to do with her qualifications as a Texas State Senator? Or is your life just really that dull & boring?

  • Chuckles  On July 2, 2013 at 7:40 pm

    2 burning questions about Ms. Davis:

    1) Are her boobs natural?

    2) What’s with the dang wart?

    • Lori Scarmardo  On July 2, 2013 at 7:50 pm

      It’s a mole, not a wart. People have them. Is a blemish free face a prerequisite for politicians these days?

      • Chuckles  On July 2, 2013 at 7:54 pm

        That’s not just a “mole,” that’s an aardvark. What’s the point of all the beautification and pretending as if that thing isn’t even there? It draws all the attention away from her boobies and her blonde hair.

      • Peter Principle  On July 2, 2013 at 8:16 pm

        You’re not just a troll. You’re a stupid asshole. How terribly proud mom must be!

    • Osama Bin Login  On July 3, 2013 at 2:23 am

      you see if you’re a Republican, you want to trash her for her good looks, and for her bad looks. So she has big boobs? must be plastic. blonde hair? must be bleached. big lump on the cheek? UGLY!!! must be her wicca practice.

      BTW, Marilyn Monroe wasn’t a democrat, so it was called it a ‘beauty spot’.

  • Roy E Pearson  On July 2, 2013 at 7:22 pm

    How infantile. Very Republican.

  • Melissa  On July 2, 2013 at 7:18 pm

    Oh, definitely. Definitely a surgically constructed Barbie doll manufactured by the left.

    Definitely not someone who put on some pounds in law school, as many law students do. Definitely not someone who then took up distance running, bought herself a straightening iron sometime in the last twenty-three years, and as an attorney, started being able to afford to go to a nice salon.

    • James Hoyt  On August 7, 2013 at 2:34 pm

      Haha which is not like Sarah Palin at all?

      Strong female + beautiful and not a doormat = threat to Republicans

  • Madsci  On July 2, 2013 at 7:11 pm

    Wait, it’s ok for a feminist to look…you know, female?

    (Clutches dog tags on ball chain) NOOOOOOOO!

  • Dr. Rockzo  On July 2, 2013 at 6:49 pm

    I am very sorry how many hours you took to write this and post this. It is stupid, has no point, and is a waste of existence.

  • jim jackson  On July 2, 2013 at 6:49 pm

    Wendy Davis for President

  • Zy  On July 2, 2013 at 6:42 pm

    OMG, Texas Dems are SO-OOOO-busted! Wendy Davis is a CYBORG – wait, no, – A BORG! Steel construction in her legs and spine enable her to stand for long hours, AND she has a SUPERSIZED CAST-IRON BLADDER! That violates the rules, I am pretty sure, SO the filibuster is null and void and the vote travels back in time, for like the 4th time, and THIS TIME it COUNTS!

    • James Hoyt  On August 7, 2013 at 2:37 pm

      It’s called a catheter… as for filibusters.. yes let’s completely remove the right to filibuster because it has been used to shoot down progressive ideals many many times by conservatives.

      Texas Dems are getting stronger and stronger and the more the reds focus on looks and not attempt to state their side, the stronger we get =D

  • Wendy Davis Por Vida.  On July 2, 2013 at 5:52 pm

    Checking your blog was a waste of time. You’re a complete moron. Do us a favor and jump off a cliff.

  • Nemo  On July 2, 2013 at 5:51 pm

    This blog post is so foolish that not even a Republican from Texas could have written it. No one this idiotic could have survived long enough to join a political party.

  • JeanLouise  On July 2, 2013 at 5:21 pm

    Wow, a woman learns to do her hair and makeup and loses a few pounds and y’all think she’s a pod person. Here’s the reality check, Bubba. People with money eat healthier and have the means to have their hair professionally cut and colored. They stop wearing Maybelline and get some good makeup and, maybe, take a lesson on how to apply it. I’m a stone-cold feminist and have done all of the above as I clawed my way through college and a career in a male-dominated profession..

    Now, let’s get to the real problem. Wendy Davis kicked your ass and you can’t stand it. She doesn’t fit your image of a feminist but she is. And she didn’t need a man to achieve personal and professional success. She got pregnant but she didn’t stay in the kitchen. She escaped the life of dependency that anti-abortion freaks want to force women into. It’s so hypocritical. You carry on about Democrats wanting to keep people dependent the government but men like you just want to keep women dependent on them. So, no matter how badly you treat them, how often you beat them or try to control them, they’re at your mercy. If they make as much money as you do, they can leave and buy their own homes. They can hire just as good a divorce lawyer as you can. They can provide for their children. That’s way all this frenzied anti-abortion rhetoric is about. Not one of you gives a damn about children because you don’t care about women. But keep it up, boys. It’s your last hurrah. A lot of women have already learned that they can survive without bad men. That’s going to leave a lot of you assholes glued to your computers and relying on your hand.

  • gianna lamorte (@giannaL)  On July 2, 2013 at 5:18 pm

    this is it? this is what you’ve come up with? you are one desperate bunch.

  • Anna Cummins (@annakcummins)  On July 2, 2013 at 5:11 pm

    This is disgusting. Is this all you could dig up? Ridiculous waste of time.

  • David  On July 2, 2013 at 5:11 pm

    The flip side? Websites are SUPPOSED to look better with age, yet this one looks shittier than html sites I did on angelfire back in high school during the late 90’s. Crazy how the world works sometimes.

  • Just Got Dumber  On July 2, 2013 at 5:03 pm

    Wow. Glad somebody blew the lid off this faker before she got too big.

  • Bob Smithers  On July 2, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    Obviously, this site was put up by Wendy Davis’ campaign to get her more cheap publicity. No one could be so stupid that they think that this would be a good way to attack her.

    • JeanLouise  On July 2, 2013 at 5:48 pm

      I’ve never found Texas Republicans to be particularly bright.

  • LP  On July 2, 2013 at 4:49 pm

    I bet this was started by a female teabilly. Women are supposed to support each other, but they are always the first ones to denigrate each other. Team Wendy! Go Wendy!

  • The Internets Are Full of the Stupid  On July 2, 2013 at 4:44 pm

    LOL Really?

    Pssst, Hey blogger, I can get you a deal on some of Wendy’s Anti Aging Magic Potion…

  • Bob  On July 2, 2013 at 4:37 pm

    I don’t care if she had plastic sugery, bleaches her hair blonde or what ever… she looks hot! And I love how she stood up against repubs for women’s rights

  • Dominion  On July 2, 2013 at 3:48 pm

    I want to thank the author of this blog for such a reasoned and insightful post. Keep it up and Texas may turn blue in 5 years instead of 10…

    There are times I really hate being a Texan. This is one of those times…

  • NOYB  On July 2, 2013 at 3:42 pm

    This is really funny! Well, first, I don’t see any pix of her chest when she was young, so have no idea what you are talking about. Second, her facial features are obviously unchanged except for having aged a bit. Her hair is obviously VERY different and a vast improvement. I’m pretty sure the party of Mitt Romney and Texas Governor Goodhair don’t have any problem with that. Let a life!

  • Bert Woodall  On July 2, 2013 at 3:42 pm

    Let’s be charitable. It’s nice to see than an emotionally stunted and apparently sexually insecure male has finally noticed that most women look better at 50 than they did at 21. Don’t know how this relates to politics, the repression of women or feminism (even the cartoon version), but an epic fail like this blog is always funny.

  • Derek  On July 2, 2013 at 3:33 pm

    Wow!!! You really did it!! You exposed this woman for being what she really is: A NORMAL WOMAN JUST LIKE ANY OTHER. The fact that someone would have to make such a stretch to try and slander and bring down this woman is a testament to the good work she’s doing…and to how lame people like the starter of this blog is.

  • Suzi Bernert  On July 2, 2013 at 3:24 pm

    You REALLY went there? I look better than my high school picture now at 61 years old and have not done a thing other than change my hairstyle. Get over yourself and try to find your brain, you obviously have lost your mind, I hope the good people of Texas are smarter than this.

  • Charoother  On July 2, 2013 at 3:19 pm

    Haha, amusing post but you probably dont know too many chicks. Besides, she’s hot now so who cares?

  • Phyllis Stein  On July 2, 2013 at 3:09 pm

    The suspicion, fear, and hatred of women revealed by this blog are the same motivating factors behind the witch hunts of the long ago past. The Republican War on Women is nothing but the same old hate-filled, spiteful, evil garbage which resulted in the persecution and death of thousands of innocents. Clearly, that evil continues to this day. Shame on anyone who believes or repeats the nonsense posted in this blog, or takes the side of anyone else who does so.

  • dudereally?  On July 2, 2013 at 3:03 pm

    That’s stupid thing to say and you’re a stupid person for saying it. I am a stupider person thanI was five minutes ago for having read your stupid blog post. Stupid.

  • Wouldnt U Liketoknow  On July 2, 2013 at 3:01 pm

    Yup, Written by a white Algo-Saxon Texas fuck-tard. The comments are more informative and relevant than the sole blog entry. Incredible the percentage of hateful, stupid people in that state.

  • pienoceros  On July 2, 2013 at 2:58 pm

    OOH OOH Do Sarah Palin next. Then Michele Bachman.


  • Zero  On July 2, 2013 at 2:55 pm

    I think Nancy Pelosi said it best: WHO CARES?

  • Bobby Gladd (@BobbyGvegas)  On July 2, 2013 at 2:47 pm


  • dee  On July 2, 2013 at 2:39 pm

    Hey Jackass — It’s called Clairol and a flat iron. Are you really so scared?

  • jw  On July 2, 2013 at 2:37 pm

    wow, she hired a stylist. shocking. truly shocking. nefarious plots at work.

  • Muriel Pritchett  On July 2, 2013 at 2:37 pm

    If Reynolds and Obama colored their hair and applied makeup, they might look younger too. She doesn’t really look younger, anyhow, just more styled/stylish. I’m sorry that she won’t dress like a bull dyke to fulfill your fantasies about feminists, that must be tough for you.

  • Dee Lemon  On July 2, 2013 at 2:35 pm

    Shame on you for reducing an important discussion on women’s right to control their own healthcare decisions, to whether or not Sen. Davis improved her appearance. You are exactly what is wrong with this country – too chickens#%t to express your opinion with a real name, and fixating on a person’s looks rather than the substance of what they say. Go back to worshipping Kim Kardashian and keep your dumb opinions to yourself.

  • Jane St.  On July 2, 2013 at 2:33 pm

    This is really stupid. Who cares? But I really think you need to update your interpretation of feminism to a more realistic definition; you obviously are just using a caricature of the worst kind.

  • Karen  On July 2, 2013 at 2:30 pm

    The person who wrote this is king of the asshats.

  • Saxifrage McElroy  On July 2, 2013 at 2:20 pm

    This blog is written by a man as they tend to have trouble seeing past hair color and style to really see the person. (My sweet husband does, bless him). Hairstyles have changed over the years and she may have more time or money these days to spend however she wants, including on salon visits. Just think if she was wearing GLASSES in those early photos! You would be completely bamboozled like movie audiences are often supposed to be!

  • Jayyverz  On July 2, 2013 at 2:19 pm

    This is without a doubt the stupidest blog post I have ever read anywhere, anytime since I first signed on to the Interwebz in 1994. What a truckload of utter rubbish, as written by yet another Tea-billy-twatwaffle-fv(k-stick.

    • Dee Lemon  On July 2, 2013 at 2:37 pm

      Love the “Teabilly-twatwaffle-fu#k-stick”!! I will be using that

  • Marty  On July 2, 2013 at 2:15 pm

    This blog adds to the overwhelming evidence that a HUGE number of right-wing assholes have never advanced psychologically or emotionally past puberty –
    Examples: GW Bush, Karl Rove, Grover Norquist, Ralph Reed – and now the idiot who started this blog

  • RockheadedMama  On July 2, 2013 at 2:04 pm

    So, the point is, men age really well, and women never do, but, this one woman may have and it is suspicious. It is suspicious because she is a “feminist” because she sometimes dresses in a “feminine way” and she has breasts and fixes her hair? Did I understand the post. I think I understand it very well. In fact, I learned far more about the author, than Senator Davis.

  • Laura  On July 2, 2013 at 1:59 pm

    Mostly, it looks like she got a better bra, a better hairstylist, and learned how to do her makeup…

    What’s really insulting is your focus on her looks. As if whether she is “frumpy” or “pretty” has any impact on her accomplishments. And the implication that if someone dyes their hair or even has a nose job, they somehow can’t possibly be an authentic advocate for battered women is not just an insult to Ms. Davis – but to women everywhere.

    Feminism, sir, is about having the freedom to be a woman on our own terms.

  • Adam Larson  On July 2, 2013 at 1:58 pm

    and does it really change anything if she had surgery and did things to improve herself?!?!?! I’m a republican but don’t agree 100% w/ party lines, and this is an example of stupidity across the parties…

  • Steve  On July 2, 2013 at 1:47 pm

    fuck you , you low life scum bag
    get a life asshole

  • Chris Cain  On July 2, 2013 at 1:44 pm

    Despite the “handicap” of being male, I have always worked to empathize with others….particularly women. Why? Because women know all too well that the world (not JUST the average male in said world) judges their worthiness by how they look. Its not fair, I know, but this concept is there none the less.

    I have always believed that women face a three-way vise over their “looks” whenever they venture out into the world for whatever reason that they must. First, they have to deal with how they themselves judge how they look, then how OTHER women think of how they look, and last but not least, how MEN think about how they look. This is true for the woman working as a clerk at a convenience store, or a female Texas state senator on an 11 hour filibuster to defeat a draconian “poison pill” bill designed to circumvent women’s reproductive rights.

    So, as others have pointed out, these suspicious, anonymous comments about how Ms. Davis has “conjured up” a better version of how she looks are small and mean-spirited, and contain ulterior motives.

    Good men everywhere will recognize this nonsense for what it is, right down to the cowardly, anonymous way these comments were made.

    Most of us who haven’t lived a sheltered life, or routinely engage in “public debate” DO have another phrase for this type of behavior…

    That phrase is chicken-shit.

  • Your Butt  On July 2, 2013 at 1:44 pm

    Are you fucking kidding?

  • Balconesfault  On July 2, 2013 at 1:33 pm

    The “human Barbie Doll” look comes with MUCH bigger breasts than Ms. Davis is sporting, which look very proportionate to her frame.

    • mike irwin  On July 2, 2013 at 4:36 pm

      And, much higher up on the chest.

  • hollytx  On July 2, 2013 at 1:24 pm

    since when are the Battered Women’s Advocacy Project and the Women’s Law Association considered “feminist organizations”? i would consider Wendy Davis a human rights political activist more than a feminist. either way, she’s got my vote.

    • bobsoper (@bobsoper)  On July 2, 2013 at 2:19 pm

      I would also consider Ms. Davis the next governor of Texas.

    • notadumbass  On July 2, 2013 at 10:42 pm

      “i would consider Wendy Davis a human rights political activist more than a feminist.”

      Same thing.

  • Sean  On July 2, 2013 at 1:06 pm

    Actually, it looks like she used some diet, exercise, sun exposure (that she’ll pay the price for in a few years) common over-the-counter products like a flat iron and bleach, and bought more stylish, flattering clothes to “transform” herself.

    There’s not really anything to compare her to the “Human Barbie Doll” links you included, but I guess we can guess how you spend your time when you’re not slagging women who have worked hard to improve their lives and the lives of people they care about.

  • Rob Gallagher  On July 2, 2013 at 1:05 pm

    [sarcasm]Ooh! Please post more pictures of Ms. Davis. I need more fapping material and she’s hot, kinda like an [strike]older[/strike] experienced [strike]Mrs. Robinson[/strike] A.J. Langer.[/sarcasm]

    This blog post is absolutely stupid.

  • None of your business  On July 2, 2013 at 1:03 pm

    Troll site started by a rightard who can’t accept that some women, like a fine wine, get better with age…

  • Lynn Lee Novak  On July 2, 2013 at 12:57 pm

    She dyed her hair and got a stylist! Oh My GOD! She’s must be the devil in disguise!

  • JackRabbit Café (@JackRabbitCafe)  On July 2, 2013 at 12:56 pm

    Whomever wrote this is a fucking idiot.

    • Eivets Rednow  On July 2, 2013 at 1:09 pm

      That’s “whoever”.

      • Jeanette  On July 2, 2013 at 2:02 pm

        No, it is ‘whomever.’ Look it up.

      • bill b  On July 2, 2013 at 2:56 pm

        “Whoever” is correct. “Whomever” is a form of the third person objective pronoun. The word is used in the nominative case as the subject of the sentence, therefore needs to be the correct form of the third person nominative; in this case, “whoever.” Having said that, the OP’s sentiment is correct. They are a fucking idiot.

    • Karen  On July 2, 2013 at 2:30 pm


    • Debra Smith  On July 2, 2013 at 3:05 pm

      I agree and then some.

  • Tom Brown  On July 2, 2013 at 12:54 pm

    At least, she has the guts to stand up and be seen for what she believes in. Unlike a certain blogger who is unknown. Why don’t you have the guts to stand up for what you believe in? Are you afraid that people might find out who you are? You are a coward!

  • Christian Salafia  On July 2, 2013 at 12:46 pm

    Your internet access should be “read only” as with this blog you’ve proven yourself too stupid to be in public unsupervised.

    Get a life.

  • JustMe  On July 2, 2013 at 12:43 pm

    Those pictures and the transition remind me much of Tina Fey, who was kind of awkward and frumpy with frizzy hair in her early 20s but became stunningly attractive into her 30s and 40s.

    Eat right, get lots of exercise, get the number of a good hair stylist, and you’ll look good into middle age, as well.

  • Dave  On July 2, 2013 at 12:26 pm

    Gee I don’t look like I did thirty years ago and would like to think I look better now than I used to, but really, if you have a point, what is it? Or are you just a moron posing as an intellectual? How bad do you repugs need to get before the rest of us call you on your games?

  • dave™©  On July 2, 2013 at 12:11 pm


  • Keith  On July 2, 2013 at 12:02 pm

    She has the same nose, eyes, and chin as she had before. And the same mole. I don’t know how the imbecile who authored this post can tell how big her chest was in the past. If she got plastic surgery, I see no evidence of it. Not that there’s anything wrong with plastic surgery. All I see is a woman with a much more flattering hairstyle.

  • John Kelly  On July 2, 2013 at 11:01 am

    Good God, I am shocked — shocked! — to learn that these public figures have enhanced their appearance. Is nothing sacred? Doesn’t Senator Davis know that feminist dogma requires her to be undyed, unshaven, free of makeup, and at least twenty pounds overweight?
    You have opened my eyes. I will never believe another word Senator Davis says, but will instead wholeheartedly swallow whatever pseudo-Christian greed-is-good misogynist claptrap Governor Perry spews. His head may be empty but at least he hasn’t dyed his hair.

  • g  On July 2, 2013 at 9:31 am

    Wow. I didn’t think anyone could be as superficial, hateful, and unprincipled as the author of this article. Human nature still has the ability to surprise.

  • Uneeda Mirror?  On July 2, 2013 at 9:21 am

    Ummm….tell me again who’s the one who has “devoted an unusual amount of attention to her physical appearance.”

  • Andrelemonparty@nytimes.net  On July 2, 2013 at 4:04 am

    Really doing a bang-up job of disproving the whole “war against women” thing.

  • Gray Wolf  On July 2, 2013 at 12:35 am

    It’s witchcraft. I tell you witchcraft. There is no other possible explanation!

  • Peter Principle  On July 1, 2013 at 8:40 pm

    Oh! My! GOD!!!!!! You mean she got her hair done!!!!!! And then she SMILED!!!??? THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!!! True patriots are forever grateful to your diligent, um, truth telling about this, um, scandalous, horrible, no good threat to our very way of life!

    I would have previously said it was impossible, but now I’m sure you can be even more, whiny, petty, asinine, ridiculous and just plain stupid, if you rilly, rilly try. How, exactly, you might accomplish this boggles the mind of those of us the triple digit club, but this post gives us all great confidence in your ability to crank out endless runny brown streams of USDA Grade AAA pure, unadulterated STUPID.

    One question remains; How stupid must one be before an idiotic, immature and just plain ridiculous personal attack like this seems something other than STUPID? Is fork in the face stupid sufficient? Or must on be full blown, rock hard, super dense singularity-type stupid? Without your help those of us in the triple digit club will never know the answer to this important question. Thanking you in advance…

  • DeSwiss  On July 1, 2013 at 8:19 pm


  • Carl Henderson  On July 1, 2013 at 7:59 pm

    Who cares? It’s her body, her money, and she can do what she wants with either.

  • Wayne Miller  On July 1, 2013 at 7:02 pm

    She looks pretty HOT, CUTE, GOOD LOOKING AND SEXY! They DO get better looking when they move to the South. I’ve seen many in 72 years and she is up there in the “blue ribbon stack”. puffboater in Florida

  • D Sanon (@DeSanon)  On July 1, 2013 at 6:59 pm

    you should see the pics of ME before and after I shave! WTF is wrong with you people???

  • Pro Women  On July 1, 2013 at 6:32 pm

    Keep digging, Junior. Seems the opposition is pretty desperate. There’s plenty of dirt thats a lot juicer on Ayatolla Perry & his bunch of Christian jihadists.

  • Matt  On July 1, 2013 at 6:16 pm

    I assume this is satire. Right?

    • realwendydavis  On July 1, 2013 at 7:10 pm

      Astute question. Do you mean satire of Davis, or satire of society’s obsession with the personal appearance of politicians? Might a more accurate term be parody, that is, a mocking of the practice of attacking politicians, particularly women politicians, based on their appearance by carrying out the practice in an exaggerated, humorous form constructed so as to be extremely vulnerable to counterattack? Of course, parody and satire are not incompatible concepts.

      • dave™©  On July 2, 2013 at 12:13 pm

        No, we’re thinking satire of the complete and total stupdity of wingnut morons.

  • beb  On July 1, 2013 at 6:10 pm

    not a fan of her but this post is ridiculous. A lot of people become more sophisticated about their personal grooming as they get older. The insinuation that this is all about plastic surgery is silly and I’m frankly disappointed that Instapundit linked to this. Jeesh, it looks like everybody is giving up on actual political debate.

  • J. Barrett Wolf  On July 1, 2013 at 6:09 pm

    Have you been this shallow all your life or have you been taking lessons from Governor Good Hair?

    • Peter Principle  On July 1, 2013 at 9:49 pm

      Oh, no, please DO NOT take this blog down! Times are still tough and we can use the laughs!

  • Concerned Texan  On July 1, 2013 at 5:58 pm

    THis blog looks like its authored by children and the logic its authors use to attack Davis is on par with a child’s logic. Please take this blog down now…you are perpetuating the sad stereotype of Texas being full of uneducated idiots right now.

  • lol  On July 1, 2013 at 5:50 pm

    I love it when sanctimonious assholes defending legislation that conflicts with a woman’s right to her own body try to pretend a woman that stands up for women can’t be appreciated by women anymore because she dyed her damn hair. seriously if this is all you have then stay home

  • bean  On July 1, 2013 at 5:38 pm

    It’s all about the hair. There are many reasons to not agree with her stance on murdering babies being a big positive, but really to go after her *blondness* is kind of beside the point. BUT I guess we do go after Biden’s hair plugs (but not enough IMHO)

  • samson  On July 1, 2013 at 5:32 pm

    Reblogged this on STORY 2 SUCCESS BLOG.

  • george  On July 1, 2013 at 5:09 pm

    Man, this is too pathetic to even mock.

  • Nutz  On July 1, 2013 at 4:59 pm

    It’s a pretty sure bet that the owner of this blog hasn’t been with a woman he didn’t have to inflate.

    • I Callahan  On July 1, 2013 at 5:29 pm

      Given the choice between the blow up doll and the angry feminist harpy – let’s get to inflating…

      • lol  On July 1, 2013 at 5:50 pm

        actually given your response I doubt you get the choice very often

      • johnmburt  On July 1, 2013 at 5:58 pm

        Millions of actual women will thank you for your choice.
        Millions of men will thank you, too — you were cramping our style and making us look bad.

      • Peter Principle  On July 1, 2013 at 9:51 pm

        I’d go for the blow-up doll, too, if, like you, it was as close as I’d ever get to a real woman.

  • Jack Klompus  On July 1, 2013 at 4:27 pm

    I love how butthurt so many people are over this. Crank up the sanctimony!

  • moseszd  On July 1, 2013 at 3:50 pm

    Maybe you should stop hanging out with trailer-park trash and meet some successful women. Because she’s nothing special in the 50-year-old professional woman who takes reasonable care of herself category.

    She’s got more and deeper wrinkles by the eyes (crowsfeet) and her bags are bigger, deeper and there are more wrinkles.. Her skin is clearly losing elasticity. She’s starting to get irregular pigmentation issues. Her nose is the same. She has the same mole. Where ever you see skin, there’s clearly aging going on.

    I think, over-all, her aging is very similar to that of my 53-year-old wife. There are some differences, but they’re not terribly significant.

    In fact, all I can see she’s ‘done’ is drop 1980s frizzy perm or has relaxed her hair and started dying her hair blond.

  • Allen  On July 1, 2013 at 3:24 pm

    I despise what this woman stands for but you’re really going to go after her for her looks? For starters, it means nothing, and besides that a LOT of women look better as they age. You’ve never been to a reunion and seen how all the beauty queens went sharply downhill while many of the plain looking girls are now hotties? Look at the other side of the political spectrum for a perfect example. Ever see a picture of Sarah Palin from high school? Chunky and homely, and yet now she’s smoking.

    • moseszd  On July 1, 2013 at 3:56 pm

      Class of ’79. And let me tell you, that is the truth. The prom queen started a catering business and is pushing the scales way over 300lbs. The cheerleader I dated is enormous. Many of the jocks are now fat slobs.

      And yet many of us improved, or at least took pride in ourselves, and kept things together. I weigh the same today as I did in HS (182lbs). Don’t have all my hair anymore so all the ‘long fethered-back’ hair so popular in the late 70’s is just a memory. But I can still fit into the same pants and shirts…

      And so can many of my friends. We haven’t all given up and sunk into muffin tops or out-right obesity. We eat right, stay active and enjoy our lives.

  • merl  On July 1, 2013 at 3:20 pm

    southern women’t faces look like cured tobacco.

    • Infantization (@infantization)  On July 1, 2013 at 3:26 pm

      Sure son, keep telling yourself that. I have lived in both the north and the south and you get 2 equal looking women. The one in the south will look 10x better because she will dress nicer, put on makeup and do her hair. The northern woman will not shave her legs, throw on sweatpants and hair in a pony tail. I hate the malls in the NE, the women look like Hippies who don’t shower.

      • Alan  On July 1, 2013 at 5:26 pm

        That is absolutely correct. When I moved South I noticed that the women down here won’t leave the house until they look right, God bless them. Up North the women are, relatively, slobs.

      • jerry andrade  On July 1, 2013 at 9:23 pm

        It’s becoming pretty clear to me, infant, that you keep a stack of ViewMaster stereotypes on your bedside table. I’m sure it helps you cope with the real world, but the rest of us prefer the actual 3D version of the universe.

        As for “Alan,” he sounds like the guy who writes off every woman who rejects him as a lesbian.

      • Peter Principle  On July 1, 2013 at 9:56 pm

        Actually, most of the women in the Deep South won’t leave the house until the doorway is widened and the “WIDE LOAD” banner is in place. Witness, witless…

  • Lynne  On July 1, 2013 at 3:02 pm

    Haven’t you anything better to do with your time? For funsies, why don’t you do a critique on Sarah Palin?

    • merl  On July 1, 2013 at 3:20 pm

      If this is supposed to be a joke, it fell kind of flat, if you’r serious I think you should see a mental health specialist ASAP. And lynne? you seem to be pretty angry. hypocrite much?

  • late late late bloomer  On July 1, 2013 at 2:45 pm

    i don’t know the first thing about wendy but i do remember all the crap the lefties threw when sarah was supposed to be enhancing. they’re fun to watch, i’ll give ’em that. are there any angrier people in the world?

  • Tybalt  On July 1, 2013 at 2:41 pm

    Looked good, still does! Wendy Davis being a feminist superhero who could kick your ass all the way down to the river and back has nothing whatsoever with blonde hair, chump. Have a great day!

  • Frank Woods  On July 1, 2013 at 2:32 pm

    This website has got to be fake…right? Satire? The adolescent musings from what passes as a Republican nerd? Is this the website Edward Snowden will be spilling his guts to? Oh no! He just released the bombshell that this aging bombshell (pun intended) does her nails! Scandal! Texghazi! God is going to spank her for her evil, temptress ways! Texas men! Don’t let her make you prematurely loose some men sperm and commit a really, really early term abortion!

  • Pete Hahn  On July 1, 2013 at 2:02 pm

    Seriously? Could you be any more shallow and pathetic? Nice job on the outreach, nitwits. I’m sure this will help win all the women of America over to your cause, ROFL

  • Scott Robert  On July 1, 2013 at 1:47 pm

    She’s very attractive.

  • DicTater  On July 1, 2013 at 1:34 pm

    Of course, since she was a single mother attending Harvard Law, she may not have had the money, time or priority to make herself look great all the time. And, she unfortunately lived in and had her photo taken in 1991. And, anyone would care what Glenn Reynolds looks or looked like, for what reason? See, males vs. females is what is known as apples and oranges. I would think a more appropriate comparison would be Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann

  • axolotl  On July 1, 2013 at 1:32 pm

    And this matters…..why? Seriously, you need a job or something.

  • SweetT  On July 1, 2013 at 1:28 pm

    Hello – feminist here. I do not give a fuck what women do to their bodies. Peace, assholes! Do you expect people that admire Davis’s courage and outspokenness to just change their minds b/c she doesn’t do her hair the same way she did 20 years ago? Fuck, 20 years ago I shaved my head.

  • Uwe1860  On July 1, 2013 at 1:26 pm

    Nice hard-hitting, substantive political insight!

    What are you guys, 12 years old?

    • jerry andrade  On July 1, 2013 at 9:14 pm

      You came here for hard-hitting, substantive political insight? Now that’s funny. The whole concept of this blog is juvenile at best. Twelve-year-olds around the globe are eye rolling at the very thought.

  • mrblifil  On July 1, 2013 at 1:25 pm

    I was going to masturbate to those images of Glenn Reynolds, but unfortunately I was overcome by a spate of projectile vomiting before I could bring Mr. Happy to full attention.

    • Joseph Corlett  On July 1, 2013 at 7:58 pm

      Okay, now that’s funny right there.

  • Geoff  On July 1, 2013 at 1:24 pm

    How do you know she was flat-chested before? You’ve got a “before” picture of her below the neck?

  • mel  On July 1, 2013 at 1:23 pm

    Way to uphold the patriarchal value of determining a woman’s worth based upon her looks. Shallow, sexist and disgusting. If this is what “political discourse” has come to, this country deserves to be flushed down the toilet. You should be ashamed.

    • Infantization (@infantization)  On July 1, 2013 at 3:21 pm

      HAHAHA I love feminists! Their irony alert function is non-existent. I can never take anyone seriously who actually uses the word “patriarchal” outside of Berkley. We are not judging her “worth” based on her looks we are judging her looks… Now grow up and stop being a little Beta male.

      • lol  On July 1, 2013 at 5:52 pm

        there’s a PUA forum board missing its rape apologist, best head back there

      • Seriously  On July 2, 2013 at 10:18 am

        It’s really naive to not understand how much of “feminine beauty” as our society defines it can easily be constructed with make up, hair, clothes, good stylists etc. People are saying she looks so different when this is literally the plot of a hundred stupid shitty movies.

        If she were ugly she’d get shit for being ugly. She has made herself look good because that’s how she’ll get elected. Sexism has essentially:

        1. Made it necessary for a woman to spend time on her looks to get respect and votes.

        2. Then calls her a monster for working within the sexist system.

        She literally cannot win. So what do you want? Oh that’s right, you want her to be silent because she’s a woman. How about you just jump off a cliff.

    • Jack Klompus  On July 1, 2013 at 4:25 pm

      Please tell me you are not a man.

  • cc  On July 1, 2013 at 1:23 pm

    Wow. This is all you got on her? Whoa… guess she will never get elected again.

  • Bob May  On July 1, 2013 at 1:21 pm

    You sound like a whiney baby.

  • Tim Roinboin  On July 1, 2013 at 1:20 pm


  • Memphis Belle  On July 1, 2013 at 12:57 pm

    Collagen or some other filler in the upper lip and botox in the forehead to raise the brows are obvious. Possibly some eyelid work as well. Interesting that she not only lightens her hair, but her eyebrows as well.

  • Angelo's Frog  On July 1, 2013 at 12:44 pm

    What’s so wrong with wanting to look nice? It may not have been important at Harvard Law in 1991 but, trust me, I’ve lived in Fort Worth for over 20 years and looking good is important for women here no matter what their political affiliation. And, that’s a good thing for us guys by the way.

    • Matt  On July 1, 2013 at 3:40 pm

      She’s hot, smart, and progressive. I want more.

  • Rich K  On July 1, 2013 at 11:22 am

    I’ll just Pretend she’s a libertarian and Hit That.

  • Sibyl S.  On July 1, 2013 at 9:51 am

    Another Planned Parenthood death cult Queen also went blonde for political purposes: http://www.starsgossips.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/hilari.jpg

    • GeorgefrickenWashington  On July 1, 2013 at 3:57 pm

      Check out this make over.. does this prove your point?

      • jr  On July 2, 2013 at 12:48 pm

        this blogger is a douchebag and so is every rectal aperture with fricken in their screen name


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: